Read Supervisor Mar's Lips: No New Smoking Rooms
While we at The Appeal do not smoke cigarettes, we will occasionally join our cancerous companions as they light up in the designated smoking room...
These are the comments for Read Supervisor Mar's Lips: No New Smoking Rooms
(5)
News Headlines
- SFPD Uppting DUI Patrols, Planning Checkpoint Memorial Day Weekend
- Shuttle Buses, Longer Trains Promised During Tonight's Long Muni Shutdown
- Court Workers Union Votes To Authorize Strike
- SF Beaches Get A Clean Bill Of Health
- Suspects In FiDi Carjacking Of Elderly Woman Identified
- Beach Chalet Synthetic Turf Plan Up For Discussion At Meeting Thursday Night
- Man Robs Two Laurel Village Shopping Center Banks Thursday Afternoon
- Golden Gate Bridge Celebrations Expected To Snarl Traffic Throughout SF
Greg Dewar said:
March 3, 2010 5:23 PM
Reply
With all due respect to the supervisor, he is a dingus for proposing this. This is a "solution" in search of a problem, and is not based on any reasonable situation one could come up with.
Eric Mar needs to spend a little less time micromanaging SF business and a little more time managing the City's out of control finances and a Muni that's hurtling towards disaster. Fix those, "Supervisor" and then come back and tell local business how you want to micromanage them.
bloomsm said:
March 3, 2010 5:29 PM
Reply
Supervisor Mar should be quiet and let people enjoy themselves, and stay the hell out of everyone else's business for once.
Second what G. Dewar says. Crime, budget, Muni, infrastructure. In that order.
What's next? Mandatory lights out so we get more rest?
renegade said:
March 3, 2010 7:21 PM
Reply
Mar had an earlier proposal about banning private karaoke rooms. Maybe he's looking for some bills he can introduce. I don't know if he's sponsored anything worthwhile.
areallyniceguy replied to comment from Greg Dewar
March 3, 2010 9:34 PM
Reply
I swear to that this current batch of supervisors is only interested in crafting ways to get their name in the media and spend a lot of time in rountable discussions with their advisors dreaming up new and stupid laws. It is getting really absurd.
DT said:
March 4, 2010 3:32 PM
Reply
I didn't vote for him and I really dislike this Daly clone. All he is interested in is furthering the Daly agenda. His monthly newsletter is an ordeal in bloviating.
He ought to consider what to do about all the closed businesses on Geary and the horrid condition of that street. But no, he has to meddle in our personal affairs and dream up new fees to extort.
Can't wait until his term is over or when he wants to jump ship into a bigger political pool.