Controller: Mayor Must Still Pay In Public Defender Funding Fight: News: SFAppeal

May 25, 2012 More Feeds

News

Controller: Mayor Must Still Pay In Public Defender Funding Fight

user-pic
  • 3 Comments
  • +0 Votes
  • Share
  • Email

In his fight for a slice of the city's ever-shrinking budget pie Public Defender Jeff Adachi used a unique argument: that more money for...

These are the comments for Controller: Mayor Must Still Pay In Public Defender Funding Fight

(3)

user-pic

It's really amazing to see Avalos once again get played by Gavin Newsom. What is the point of electing a progressive if they just capitulate to the Mayor? I guess all Avalos really knows how to do is listen to his own voice. Shows once again why inexperienced people should not be elected, and most certainly shouldn't be made budget committee chair when they are still on training wheels!

user-pic

@Greg:where is the Avalos/Newsom angle in this story because it's not described well in Chris' filing. The problem here is that the U.S. Constitution guarantees indigent defendants the right to a public defender, regardless of whether a given community can afford it or not (i.e., the U.S. Constitution mandates the attorney, but it provides no method of how a city or state should pay for it). In some communities, private lawyers literally survive on court-appointed public defense appointments (in federal courts, the hourly rate is about $75 per hour; not bad). Adachi's not persuading anyone with his numbers or his logic. Time for a re-think.

user-pic

Avalos is out of his league as chair. Newsom and Kawa are the beneficiaries of this inexperience, and probably thank their lucky stars that they can snow him on a regular basis.

Leave a comment

Have you read our comments policy? If not, please do.