Chronicle's Panties Wadded Over Prospect Of Sex Tents, What About Yours?

"Sex Tent" would be an awesome name for a rock band. Hell, any band, really.

I've got a sex tent... IN MY PANTS!

Reading this article? Perv.

Nice one! Er, comment, that is...

Eve: minor typo edit needed here, where the second "of" should be "if":
"...the question of what you are doing at Folsom of you're freaked out by that stuff,..."

I would say that they ought to just allow it publicly within the area of the street fair, but if a compromise is necessary this seems reasonable enough. I can sympathize with residents who have issues with the fair, but if you didn't want to live on a street with a major leather fair taking place every year that was really your responsibility before moving in. They were there long before you were.

Of course, I've also thought that some sort of cordoned off area for outdoor sex in GG Park (both with and without seclusion) would be a great idea.

We really need to take this city back from prudes (who I can't imagine being happy living here to begin with) and people who seem to be under the impression that the entire world is made for children, rather than the adults who make up the majority of the population.

Is the Chronicle aware that there are buildings all over the city where people are allowed to engage in sex whenever and with whomever they wish? We call them "houses."